FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. (AP) — A 23-year-old man who posted on Fb, “I don’t know why I don’t go on a killing spree.” A West Palm Seashore couple who shot up their residence whereas excessive on cocaine. A 31-year-old Gulf Coast man who pointed a semiautomatic rifle at a motorcyclist. All 4 Florida residents had their weapons taken away by judges underneath a “crimson flag” regulation the state handed three weeks after a mentally disturbed gunman killed 17 folks at Marjory Stoneman Douglas Excessive Faculty in Parkland two years in the past Friday. The regulation, supported by legislators of each events , has been utilized greater than 3,500 occasions since, with the tempo accelerating over the past half of 2019. Even so, an Related Press evaluation of the regulation confirmed its use is inconsistent, with some counties and cities utilizing it not often and others under no circumstances. Advocates of Florida’s crimson flag measure say earlier than it existed, it was usually tough to take away firearms from these making threats or struggling extreme psychological breakdowns. Investigators didn’t act on stories that the Parkland shooter was threatening to hold out a faculty bloodbath. However even when that they had, it’s seemingly he would have been allowed to maintain his weapons as a result of he had no felony convictions or involuntary, long-term psychological commitments, they are saying.Pinellas County Sheriff Bob Gualtieri, who leads a fee that investigated the bloodbath’s causes, says the shooter would have simply certified for a crimson flag order. Gualtieri says whereas it’s inconceivable to say that will have prevented the taking pictures, the gunman wouldn’t have been capable of legally purchase weapons or ammunition, making his preparation tough.“We now have wanted this regulation for many years,” mentioned Gualtieri, who began a unit in his division that handles solely crimson flag circumstances. However the regulation additionally has vocal critics: those that say it violates the U.S. and state constitutions, together with the appropriate to bear arms, and others who argue that legal guidelines already on the books in Florida made it pointless. Nonetheless others say it discriminates in opposition to the poor: As a result of the listening to with a decide is just not a legal continuing, low-income defendants aren’t supplied with a free lawyer. Sixteen different states plus the District of Columbia have comparable legal guidelines, 11 of which had been enacted after the Feb. 14, 2018, taking pictures at Stoneman Douglas. President Donald Trump has at occasions supported a federal proposal, however has not strongly advocated it earlier than Congress. To get an order in Florida, police companies should file a request with a civil courtroom, citing severe psychological sickness or threats an individual has made. If the decide agrees, the individual should give up their firearms to police. Inside two weeks, a listening to is held throughout which the decide decides whether or not to take the individual’s weapons away for a yr. Police companies can apply for an extension if there may be proof an individual stays a risk after a yr. If not, the weapons are returned. Orlando lawyer Kendra Parris, who’s making an attempt to get a case earlier than the state Supreme Court docket to overturn the regulation, says it doesn’t adequately outline some phrases, resembling what constitutes severe psychological well being points. And in any case, she says, different Florida statutes, resembling misdemeanor breach of the peace, already permit police to take firearms from the actually harmful earlier than they act. That statute might simply have been invoked in opposition to the Stoneman Douglas shooter, she mentioned. “In all probability two dozen occasions this man might have been charged for breach of the peace and had his firearms eliminated,” Parris mentioned. The AP evaluation reveals that from March 2018, when the regulation was enacted, by December 2019, there was a large disparity in its per capita utilization in Florida’s 67 counties. Twenty issued a minimum of one for each 5,500 residents throughout that point interval, the statewide common. Three issued a minimum of one for each 2,000 residents, together with Gualtieri’s Pinellas County, which incorporates the Tampa Bay space, and has almost 1 million folks. Highlands County, close to Lake Okeechobee, ranked No. 1, issuing one for each 850 residents. On the opposite excessive, 12 counties issued one for each 30,000 residents or much less. Two neighboring Panhandle counties — Escambia and Santa Rosa — issued one for each 100,000 residents or extra. One other 9 small, rural counties issued none. Highlands County Sheriff Paul Blackman mentioned he doesn’t know why his county is No. 1, however he famous that his deputies common two calls every day for psychological well being crises. The county has simply over 100,000 residents and was the scene of a financial institution taking pictures final yr that left 5 girls useless. “If somebody has made a risk to harm themselves or others and is intent on utilizing a firearm, we’ll attempt to get a threat safety order in opposition to them so we are able to take away these weapons,” Blackman mentioned. However even the regulation isn’t a assure: Two Highlands males who obtained orders nonetheless killed themselves, one with carbon monoxide and the opposite with an illegally obtained gun, he mentioned. The sheriffs whose counties had no or few crimson flag orders throughout the reviewed interval mentioned in an AP questionnaire that they don’t seem to be philosophically against the regulation — they only haven’t wanted it. Santa Rosa Sheriff Bob Johnson mentioned it was a “fluke” that his county of 155,000 had solely issued one order. Baker County Maj. Randy Crews defined that the dearth of crimson flag orders from his county on the Georgia border west of Jacksonville has to do with the truth that his deputies know many of the 27,000 residents and may intercede rapidly if somebody is having a breakdown and making threats. Crews mentioned most potential crimson flag circumstances are requested to give up their weapons to a relative, who’s instructed to not return them till the individual finishes psychological well being remedy. He mentioned that method works higher than confrontation and has by no means backfired. He mentioned the workplace wouldn’t hesitate to make use of the regulation, nonetheless, if somebody didn’t cooperate.